Already take the poll?
Scroll down for results!
Hoosiers for Medical Liberty Poll: Moratorium on mRNA Vaccinations?
Your voice matters! As we continue advocating for medical liberty, we want to hear from you regarding a potential moratorium on mRNA vaccinations in Indiana.
H4ML has always stood firmly on the principle that every individual should have the right to choose whether to vaccinate or not. A core belief of our organization is that the patient-provider relationship should not be interrupted by government mandates or interference. Decisions about healthcare—including vaccinations—should be made on an individual basis with informed decision-making at the center.
However, this issue presents a deep conflict for us.
On one hand, our commitment to liberty means opposing government bans that interfere with personal choice. If we support a moratorium on mRNA vaccines, could that set a precedent for future bans on other health choices that others may deem as "dangerous"—such as homeopathy, ivermectin, or natural health alternatives?
Government overreach is a real and pressing concern.
On the other hand, from a medical perspective, the situation is alarming.
Research has consistently shown serious safety and efficacy failures with mRNA vaccines. Despite the clear lack of long-term studies, compromised regulatory oversight, and the medical community’s failure to acknowledge or properly investigate side effects, these shots continue to be promoted without accountability.
We have witnessed devastating injuries and even loss of life. Tragically, we may never fully understand the long-term generational impact of these injections.
H4ML finds itself at a crossroads--how do we balance medical reality with our commitment to liberty?
That’s why we’re coming to you, our dedicated members, to weigh in on this issue.
Your voice matters! As we continue advocating for medical liberty, we want to hear from you regarding a potential moratorium on mRNA vaccinations in Indiana.
H4ML has always stood firmly on the principle that every individual should have the right to choose whether to vaccinate or not. A core belief of our organization is that the patient-provider relationship should not be interrupted by government mandates or interference. Decisions about healthcare—including vaccinations—should be made on an individual basis with informed decision-making at the center.
However, this issue presents a deep conflict for us.
On one hand, our commitment to liberty means opposing government bans that interfere with personal choice. If we support a moratorium on mRNA vaccines, could that set a precedent for future bans on other health choices that others may deem as "dangerous"—such as homeopathy, ivermectin, or natural health alternatives?
Government overreach is a real and pressing concern.
On the other hand, from a medical perspective, the situation is alarming.
Research has consistently shown serious safety and efficacy failures with mRNA vaccines. Despite the clear lack of long-term studies, compromised regulatory oversight, and the medical community’s failure to acknowledge or properly investigate side effects, these shots continue to be promoted without accountability.
We have witnessed devastating injuries and even loss of life. Tragically, we may never fully understand the long-term generational impact of these injections.
H4ML finds itself at a crossroads--how do we balance medical reality with our commitment to liberty?
That’s why we’re coming to you, our dedicated members, to weigh in on this issue.
87% of those who took the poll wanted some kind of ban.
To me, this is a sign of a significant cultural shift.
To me, this is a sign of a significant cultural shift.
When I started Hoosiers for Medical Liberty, a large number of our supporters were not part of the "anti-vax" crowd. Many were new and only against the COVID jabs.
It was not uncommon for H4ML's members to push back when I discussed the risks of childhood vaccinations.
While that has largely diminished, I would have never expected that 61% of those answering the poll would call for a ban on ALL vaccines, including the childhood schedule.
It was not uncommon for H4ML's members to push back when I discussed the risks of childhood vaccinations.
While that has largely diminished, I would have never expected that 61% of those answering the poll would call for a ban on ALL vaccines, including the childhood schedule.
Again, this shows a huge cultural shift, even if it is just within our circle.
Though, many of those who took the poll were new to our email/text messages.
I have said it many times, and I will continue to say it.
Right to Refuse, is the right to choose.
I am not comfortable with a legislative ban because I don't want to set a precedent and put things like homeopathy, supplements, or even ivermectin at risk of being banned.
As I read through the comments, it was obvious that those taking the poll felt that safety was of the utmost concern.
Over and over again, comments mentioned a lack of studies and transparency.
Hoosiers are demanding the ability to make INFORMED DECISIONS.
We will continue this discussion and work together to find out how to correct course.
Moratoriums, or temporary pauses, on vaccines have been suggested, and I would not be opposed to language that would pause vaccines until Hoosiers are provided with clear information about the risks, benefits, and alternatives to vaccination.
Though, many of those who took the poll were new to our email/text messages.
I have said it many times, and I will continue to say it.
Right to Refuse, is the right to choose.
I am not comfortable with a legislative ban because I don't want to set a precedent and put things like homeopathy, supplements, or even ivermectin at risk of being banned.
As I read through the comments, it was obvious that those taking the poll felt that safety was of the utmost concern.
Over and over again, comments mentioned a lack of studies and transparency.
Hoosiers are demanding the ability to make INFORMED DECISIONS.
We will continue this discussion and work together to find out how to correct course.
Moratoriums, or temporary pauses, on vaccines have been suggested, and I would not be opposed to language that would pause vaccines until Hoosiers are provided with clear information about the risks, benefits, and alternatives to vaccination.
Below is a video of the slides from the presentation. There is NO SOUND.
Here are more comments from others taking the poll:
