|
hts".Updated!!! 3/24/25 💀🚨dangerous bill being mascaraed as "parental rights". SB143- Anti-Parental rights bill's goal isn't to protect your fundamental parental rights, but to give you a way to sue the gov't AFTER your rights are violated. Worse yet, the next time someone decides there is a compelling governmental interest, your parental rights can be trampled, in the "least restrictive means." Like a mask? Vaccine? Quarantine? I met with those pushing for this bill and was able to ask pointed questions. They admitted that they did not take into account how this would impact vaccination rights. They admitted that they did not have a case example of how this had helped a SINGLE family in other states. They admitted in committee that language passed in other states had not lead to an increase in litigation. They even admitted that this language had not had a "chilling effect" or changed the behavior of stat agencies who were committing the offenses this bill is designed to stop. So HOW has this languages helped anyone? Are you willing to risk your parental rights for "compelling governmental interests" for no benefit? I am not. For more info check these two previous blogs: https://hoosiersformedicalliberty.com/blog/h4ml-appreciates-your-action https://hoosiersformedicalliberty.com/blog/sb-143-anti-parent-bill-understood SB143 was heard in the House Judiciary Committee and passed 10-3. Unfortunately this dangerous bill will move on to 2nd reading as early as Thursday. At the close of the committee hearing Senator Liz Brown (Ft. Wayne) got up and stated "We know parents are the primary care givers." Does Liz really think you are just your children's "caregiver"? Do caregivers get to make the decisions about health, religion, medical care and education? NO. PARENTS DO. Brown and the other legislators need a clear message- PARENTAL RIGHTS ARE NOT SECONDARY to a compelling governmental interest. Hoosiers want to PREVENT the violation of rights, not simply be able to litigate AFTER the fact. Proponents of the bill tell use that this will reduce violations of parenental rights while in the same breath explain how current laws are being ignored. Who in their right mind would believe that those who don't obey the law are going to suddenly start when a new one is instituted? Their response might include statements about why the application of "strict scrutiny" is so important and how being able to sue the government will change these issues. WRONG. The taxpayers will be paying the penalties for the actions of people who break the law, violate parental rights and are being paid salaries by--- THE TAX PAYERS. Can someone please pinch me, wake me up from this nightmare- NONE OF THIS MAKES SENSE. Schools cant find and keep good teachers. DCS can't find and keep good social workers- and the ones they do have are over worked, under qualified, or underpaid. Worst of all, rouge teachers/DCS employees are NOT going to care if your tax dollars are wasted on litigation so long as their agenda is being carried out. Litigation is not going to fix this problem. Adding insult to injury, this language tells the court system AND those violating parental rights HOW to explain how their actions were necessary as it relates to a compelling governmental interest. Finally, today- legislators added salt to the wound by removing the requirement for the state to carry burden of proof that they did not violate the parental rights. Burden of proof will now rest squarely on the shoulders of the parents whose rights were violated. Let us know if they give feedback ;) In Liberty, Ashley This information is outdated and the calls below this point DO NOT need to be made. I am leaving them here in case your legislator is listed below- know that their offices were getting lots of calls 3/23 and 3/24....
📞Call these Judiciary Committee members BEFORE 3/24 at 10 AM and tell them: “Parental rights are NOT secondary to 'compelling governmental interests.' Strike that language from SB 143 or KILL the bill!” Call Reps: Jeter 317-232-9769 Ireland 317-232-9708 Meltzer 317-232-9782 Prescott 317-232-9751 Steuerwald 317-234-3827 Davis 317-232-9757 Garcia Wilburn 317-232-9750 Bauer 317-232-9770
2 Comments
Rochelle
3/24/2025 07:14:46 pm
I am not sure about what I am thinking., yet No bill passes without Governor. Braun signing it. I am 100% if we give him the underlying details here, he will. Veto the Bill. In the meantime, what good does it do when the.Consensus goes against parents who are voters? There has to be a way legally to block this crap! I say RALLY WEDS. and Email these people tonight and tomorrow before they go back Thursday.
Reply
Gary Strunk
3/24/2025 10:29:17 pm
Parental rights are not secondary to governmental interests. Parental rights are God given,and apart of our freedoms. Not to be trampled on by government bureaucrats.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorAshley Grogg RN-MSN sharing insights, tips, and updates on Medical Liberty throughout the Hoosier state. Archives
May 2026
Categories
All
|
RSS Feed